Election Interference

The Supreme Court is hearing a case of the Biden Administration censoring/manipulating free speech through agents and cooperative Media. Another upcoming case involves whether a state Court or state official can remove a person accused of insurrection from its state election ballot. Also, before the High Court is whether the Constitution gives the President immunity from prosecution for Presidential acts. There is an obvious thread running through each of these cases – election interference against Donald Trump. Conservative speech is censored by Joe Biden to dampen conservative votes. Democrat State officials are using a strained and unestablished accusation of insurrection to eliminate Conservative votes for Trump. Trump is being prosecuted by Democrat state AG’s in order to suppress conservative votes for Trump. The interpretation and application of the Constitution is the primary role of the Supreme Court.

It seems impossible to consider these three cases and ignore the central theme upon which each has risen. If Biden is deemed to have perpetrated censorship as decided by the District and Appeals Courts regarding Trumps election activity it is a Constitutional violation for the intent of election interference. If Democrat State judges and Officials have barred Trump from their elections contrary to the Constitution and fact of insurrection it is interference in the Federal Election. If Trump is not given immunity from state prosecution for questioning the validity of the 2020 election as the sitting President it is because Democrats seek to interfere in the 2024 election. 

A question must be asked whether there is a limit to Democrat violations of the Constitution? Joe Biden started war on the Houthis without notification of Congress in violation of the Constitution. His Covid mandates were deemed unconstitutional. Numerous acts committed by agencies under his direction have violated the Constitution, the most flagrant and obvious is his refusal to enforce security of our southern border. Of course, he should be impeached for all these violations, as well as high crimes and misdemeanors of profiting from foreign entities in exchange for favors to his family members. He bragged publicly about withholding a government grant to Ukraine unless the prosecutor charging his son was fired. All his lies should mean something, but Bill Clinton could not be impeached for lying, in court, under oath. 

If the Supreme Court can not see what is happening in these cases  and to the electoral process by elected Democrats, does it have any value or purpose? Is this the last opportunity to affirm the rule of law in America? Nevertheless, we already had a civil war, one in in which the Supreme Court and a President willing to ignore the Constitution initiated. Government is easily corrupted. Turning to God is our only Hope.