Future Automotive Design

The release of the newest automobile had been kept secret, just like a weapons development project, top secret. Though there was an industry of speculation, it was not fed by hints, leaks or anything, but imagination and history. The transformation of automobile design started with the abandonment of historical evolutionary processes, where each new release stood alone, no versions, editions or adaptations of a predecessor model. After marketing had been supplanted by actual engineering, substance ruled over form and it changed everything. Patching up last years model with a few new shiny bells and whistles had become antiquated. The technological advancement of design enabled UPD, Universal Point Development, such that a baseline was no longer the starting point – history was eclipsed and discarded, just as physical memory had replaced serial tape storage.

These new releases were completely new units. One might ask why develop new parts when last years part is still viable? The answer is that the innovation of the assembly line, over a hundred years ago, had become defunct. There are no unimportant parts, the whole is no longer the sum of the parts. UPD removed limitations that resided, even in the designers subconscious mind. Former efficiency in design, production and assembly had produced a product life-cycle lasting from five to ten years, but now there is no cycle of incremental versions, new releases are altogether new. The old, so called, efficiencies were altogether replaced by new technologies, processes, and materials.

What everyone is interested in these days is not the “How”, but the “What”. “How fast can it go”, was replaced by “what can it do.” The last release was waterproof to three meters. It was shown driving down the beach into the water until it disappeared just below the surface, after the suspense built, it slowly emerged up onto the shore and tore off in a spray of mist and sand. The releases are beautifully unique, but their style does not betray functionality as large, heavy, and bulky models once denoted back country accessibility. These vehicles can transform with adaptive design. Of course, every function is not universally desired and some features serve multiple functions, for example, a sound proof car is also a waterproof car; an all terrain vehicle is also self-repairing, and multi-fuel options can keep them running longer in any environment. Aesthetics, the concern with the nature and appreciation of beauty, is not diminished, but enhanced in this unlimited realm of design. Vehicles can repair themselves of scratches and certain damage, just as they can repaint and recolor themselves. The thought of purchasing a vehicle of a particular color, is a concept that has lost all meaning. This sounds like science fiction because the words “repaint” and “repair” convey images of laborious activity done in paint and body shops. However, the replacement of steel exteriors and fluid paint with micro perforated fiber and light diffusing particulates enabled these laborious tasks to become as easy as opening a valve to release agents that fill holes and change color. 

One final point should be explained, these vehicles are very expensive, so much that only the super-wealthy can afford them, but they out bid each other trying to secure just one of the latest releases. However, the high price is not due to production or assembly costs, but simply as much as the market can bear. After all, it’s not important, as Yeshua said, “Watch out! Be on your guard against all kinds of greed; life does not consist in an abundance of possessions.” (Luke 12:15). Moreover, we know that only one thing is needed, “Whoever has the Son has life; whoever does not have the Son of God does not have life.” (1 John 5:12).

The Perfect You

“I praise you because I am fearfully and wonderfully made; your works are wonderful, I know that full well.” (Psalm 139: 14). Scripture acknowledges the wonder creator God incorporated into the human being. Even so, our fallen human nature in this fallen world full of corruption is far from perfect. Mankind’s legacy on earth is one of total depravity, with the singular notable exception of Yeshua Messiah’s, together with His influence, leading and ongoing presence in the congregation of believers, which is a work of God.

Men still like to imagine various states of utopia on earth, the perfect society and economy was to be communist socialism. The perfect city was to be the Tower of Babble reaching into the heavens. True perfection does not exist on earth and never will because it is infinite and eternal. Science has discovered that the earth was created at a point in time and located within an expanding universe. Scripture tells us that the earth will wear out and be destroyed by fire. (2 Peter 3: 10-12). This truth of “wearing out” is described by the second law of thermodynamics which states that our physical world is transforming into less complex states as energy is released over time. As to the earth’s destruction by fire, it is very possibly a nova or even an extra large solar flare could destroy the earth. 

In spite of these truths regarding human depravity (confirmed by at least six thousand years of history), the physical environment (with myriads of failed utopian ideas) and social experimentation (communists, socialist, dictatorships, and kingdoms – none have never produced a lasting or just government/nation, let alone a utopia), a rising tide of secular humanistic idealism is gaining popularity across the world. It is so flawed and ridiculous on its face that no reasonable person would give it a second thought, but it has a hook that so intrigues and appeals to certain people they embrace it as heartily and forcefully as a large bass striking a lure, leaping out of the water in an explosive attack. The lure is three pronged, 1) the standard of true perfection is replaced with a notion of goodness defined by the individual. “I’m good, I say the right things; I’m accepted by other Humanist, and my science is better than the foolish religions.” 2) Mankind is capable of anything, we are in charge of our own destiny. As we throw off the yoke of being subservient to a creator God, we become god. We can settle another planet as this one becomes uninhabitable.  3) Rationalism, reason, and relativity are our tools to reshape society by the most brilliant and elite among us. Through political correctness, history revision, and indoctrinal education we can teach and enforce our higher ideals of the supremacy of secular humanism.

In fact, God has destined man for relationship with himself in heaven, but apart from Yeshua nothing holds together. (Col. 1: 16-17; John 1: 3). Scripture explains that when our earthly physical bodies fail in death all believers will inherit a new heavenly body that will be eternal and far more wonderful and glorious than our earthly body. All this is through Yeshua Messiah who has opened access and restored relationship with Almighty God as our Savior and Lord. The perfect you will be fully realized in heaven, eternally in God’s presence. “When you sow, you do not plant the body that will be, but just a seed, perhaps of wheat or of something else….So will it be with the resurrection of the dead. The body that is sown is perishable, it is raised imperishable; it is sown in dishonor, it is raised in glory; it is sown in weakness, it is raised in power; it is sown a natural body, it is raised a spiritual body. If there is a natural body, there is also a spiritual body….And just as we have borne the image of the earthly man, so shall we bear the image of the heavenly man….in a flash, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet. For the trumpet will sound, the dead will be raised imperishable, and we will be changed. For the perishable must clothe itself with the imperishable, and the mortal with immortality then the saying that is written will come true: “Death has been swallowed up in victory.” (1 Cor. 15: 37, 42-44, 49, 52-53). Praise God for His indescribably good gift to man, the Savior Messiah Yeshua, in whom are hidden all the promises of God.

Proof of Claim

The majority of the food we eat has seeds in it. These seeds when planted or merely dropped on fertile soil would grow into another plant and eventually produce more food. This relationship between beings and plants on this planet is so remarkable as to indicate intelligent design. This premise with far more and better illustrations was linked to creationism in a US District court, Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, 400 F. Supp. 2d 707 (M.D. Pa. 2005). Can any Court define what is science and what is not? The assumption of the case was that “detailed scientific examination has rebutted the claims that evolutionary explanations are inadequate.” This is a double negative which covertly asserts that science has proved evolution as a fact that is beyond question. Much of the comments about this case relate to the parties, the witnesses, the judge, and everyones beliefs, motives, and intents whether spoken or not. It is a horrible case for that reason, and others, and it should have been about the actual statute that sought to bolster scientific inquiry into alternatives to evolution and open further study into gaps, weaknesses, and uncertainty of evolution as a theory about the origin of life. Most recently science has shown that the universe exploded into existence in what is called the “Big Bang”. This discovery puts evolution theory in great peril as it limits the infinite time upon which evolution theory hindges. 

The greatest hoaxs in evolution’s scientific proof is the so-called “primordial soup”. Carbon-13 to carbon-12 ratio analysis, plus nitrogen-15 to nitrogen-14 ratio analysis on ancient carbonaceous material, further establishes that a primordial soup or mineral substrate of prebiotic molecules, never existed on earth. See Mink T. Rosing, “C-Depleted Carbon Microparticles”, p.674-76; Stephen J. Mojzsis et AL “Evidence for life on earth before 3,800 Million Years Ago”, etc. There are too many other errors and inconsistencies with evolution to enumerate, but the humanist lobby prevents any critique of their foundational theory that for them proves (together with much faith in fake science) there is no God.

In the Pennsylvania Middle District Court, Judge Jones ruled against the defendant, Dover school board, that wanted to add the following statement to their biology curriculum, “Students will be made aware of the gaps/problems in Darwin’s theory and of other theories of evolution including, but not limited to, intelligent design. Note: Origins of life is not taught.” The judge concluded there was evidence to support a verdict that Intelligent Design was equivalent to Creationism, although it was clear that the school board did not believe all existing science comported with evolutionary doctrine. His conclusion that it was equivalent to Creationism linked his decision to the Supreme Court case, Edwards v. Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578 (1987), which declared the teaching of Creationism contrary to the Constitutions Establishment clause.

One important principle that is lost on most people today is that a Federal District Court has jurisdiction in its own district only. The eleven Circuit Courts of Appeal have authority only over their individual regions. There are differences in various districts and occasionally between Circuits. Therefore, the precident of the Kitzmiller case is only controlling in the Middle District of Pennsylvania. Other states and school boards across the nation are free to include in their curriculum encouragement to explore, test, critique and/or otherwise pursue scientific fact and theory that contradicts evolution. In his ruling he failed to adequately address the school boards intent to foster open scientific inquiry and investigation among its students and faculty, but defended a flawed evolution theory and attributed only religious zealotry to the school board.

The forces of secular humanism have established evolution as a secure base for their assualt on truth, free speech, and critique of their fascist ideology. Therefore, any educational authority that chooses to restore a healthy and uncompromising search for truth regarding the origin of life and the cosmos should expect a well organized opposition of evolutionists dogma, propaganda, and media smear tactics. Science is on the side of open analysis, unbiased testing, and search for the truth, not measured by supposed votes of how many so-called experts or scientists believe in evolution, but by the actual cosmos around us, its physical laws, characteristics and nature, seen and unseen. Every student in American public schools must be taught evolution, that everything which exists sprang from nothing through eons of random chance and happenstance such that all the complexity, wisdom, ingenuity, beauty, function and design, and interrelated purpose of all things, even every child is only a freak accident of nature. It’s a lie and most people know it. This is what the Bible says about it. “The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of people, who suppress the truth by their wickedness, since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.” (Romans 1: 18-20).

A Theory For Atheists

If you are a devoted atheist you will need some “Science” to support anything you believe, or at least a theory that has not been fully discredited. This is the status of science today, as so much of what is called fact can not be established through the scientific method here and now. Therefore, theories carry significant weight in scientific research. Unknowns are explained with theories that are further supported or discredited by observation, new discoveries, conjecture and/or educated guesses. For example, until recently, the universe and related theories about it were based on an assumption that the universe always existed in a static state. New scientific discoveries reveal that the universe is expanding which obliterated the static model and all theory based upon it. An expanding universe presents all sorts of new questions because it points to a beginning a millisecond before the so called “Big Bang.”

Cosmology, the study of the origin of the universe, currently concludes that over billions of years random and forced events caused elements to combine into molecules that were converted to amino acids that eventually came to life and burst into a plethora of prehistoric life. The fossil record, depicted in the cambium layer, shows a single unique period on earth where life exploded into a multitude of organisms, but it does not reveal any links between separate species. Different species do mutate, adapt and adjust to their environment, or fail to and become extinct. No new species have evolved during recorded history or in the fossil record, since they first appeared. Nevertheless, evolution is now declared scientific fact, based on a presumed majority of scientists’ acceptance. While fact and truth can not be voted into reality, let’s assume a natural and random process of evolution caused life and formed all species we now see. This same process of random chance must still be in force, unless by its accidental creation of man evolution produced an animal greater than itself and was promptly terminated by man through his own intervention.

If human development did not stop evolution then we can predict that a perfect human will evolve sometime in human history. That perfect person, by chance will have abilities that evolution will endow, which exceed those yet observed or scientifically established in humanity to date. This perfect mutation will not be prone to war, hatred, selfishness, greed and all the other deficiencies of mankind. Moreover, he will demonstrate abilities traditional man does not have. Like the movie “Water World” he will grow gills in order to live if the earth becomes covered by water. Like the movie “The Matrix” he will be a Messiah with abilities that transcend those of ordinary men and women.

There are things which science can not explain. Today, people are miraculously healed and medical science can not refute the effect nor explain the cause. History points to a messiah, a perfect man, who was killed by the Roman empire, yet returned to life three days later. He exhibited supernatural powers and was above the failings, vices, and wickedness observed in ordinary men. A man of science may very well consider the vast evidence supporting the words, actions, and deeds of the perfect man, Yeshua of Nazareth, and recognize that He was supernatural. Even His birth was extraordinary. Was this Messiah a product of the evolution of Mankind? Considering He was the product of evolution, should we not listen to His enlightened understanding and give heed to His admonition? What did He say, oh yeah, there is a Creator God in heaven who made all things.

Asian Blight

In 1986 Varroa mites were introduced into the American bee population.  These mites have destructive results in bee hives.  The American population of bees has declined as much as fifty percent and continue to experience stress and decline from these blood sucking parasites. The mites came from Asia, where Asian bees are able to defend against these mites, through a regimen of grooming unknown to the American varieties of honey bees.  Prior to 1986, beekeeping was rather easy and nonchalant compared with today’s frenzy of mite defenses.

It got me thinking about the long list of invasive species that originate from Asia.  One of the earliest and most famous is the Japanese Chestnut that brought a blight that attacked the American Chestnut and wiped out an entire species.  For urban technocrats of the twenty first century this may seem utterly irrelevant, until one considers the forest of which the American Chestnut was a major part.  Chestnut wood is impervious to insects and endures for many years even in ground contact.  Forest animals needed this valuable food source.  At Fall Creek Falls State Park in Tennessee, (where the highest falls east of the Mississippi River is found) a square chestnut log lays upon the ground as a bench near the overlook.  It is a huge slab of American Chestnut still solid and enduring.  In 1922, my grandfather built his house, a log cabin, in the Tennessee highlands where Chestnut logs were plentiful.  It still stands and the logs are as solid as the day they were crafted into a cabin.

Perhaps the forest has seen the most invasive impact from foreign strains.  The Elm is now experiencing a similar blight as the Chestnut from Asia.  Today, we see woodlands engulfed by Japanese Lilac, choking out many native plants.  The Tree of Heaven is a worthless invasive species that is polluting the forests of America, along with the Paulownia.  However, Paulownia is developing a small market for rare slow growth trees that have interesting qualities of strength to weight, but its rapid multiplication has an impact that is uncertain.

Not only bees and the forest have experienced harmful effects from Asian species, Asian Mussels clog the Mississippi River and Asian Carp are taking over American rivers and lakes and decimating feed stocks.  Not all invasive or harmful species come from Asia.  The dreaded starling, whom my brother and I call the rats of the sky, came from Great Britain in 1890 and now are the most prevalent bird in America, as they have no predator to check their expansion.  At the army base near Fort Campbell, Ky, it became necessary to exterminate hundreds of thousands of starlings that were threatening operations on the base.  Starlings are extremely aggressive birds that drive other species from nest sites they want to use.  Among the species theyve chased off are Wood Ducks, Buffleheads, Northern Flickers, Great Crested Flycatchers, Tree Swallows, and Eastern Bluebirds.  The Stink Bug has no predator here and is from Asia, consequently it is everywhere and stinks.

This is not an all-inclusive list, but it is clear that Asian plants, animals, aquatic life, fowls and insects need to stay in Asia along with their associated blight, mites, viruses and other incompatible features.  European Honey bees were reintroduced in America in 1622, but fossils indicate they were here ages ago, dispelling the idea they are not native to America.  It is past time to be alert to the devastations that come from foreign immigration of plants, animals and insects. We have laws and precautions in place, but it is good for everyone to know and understand these risks.  Don’t hesitate to squash a Stink Bug, Starling, Japanese Lilac or Tree of Heaven.

A Matter of Faith

This 2014 movie is about evolution versus creationism, a topic which few in the secular mainstream would find interesting, but Christians might.  As a “Christian” film it does not have the flash, pomp, and professionalism that fifty million dollars can buy.  Harry Anderson plays a biology professor at a state University who religiously promotes evolution in his classes.  A Christian freshman is confronted with evolution taught as incontrovertible fact while her parents fear that her faith is being destroyed.  Thus, a debate between these two opposing theories for the origin of life ensues.

It is rated 3.7 on IMDB which shocked me as I have seen many 6.5 movies that were much worse than this movie.  Harry Anderson’s acting was outstanding.  The plot did include some worn out stereotypical scenes about college as a faith destroying experience, yet, it had some pleasant surprises as well.  Some reviews criticized the writer for thinking anyone who believes in evolution might be persuaded by this film.  I don’t think that was the intent, rather it was to present evolution as requiring faith just as creationism does.  Christian reviews gave this movie high marks because it was a movie aimed for that audience.

In secular society and the anti-christian media evolution won the debate decades ago.  It is taught even in grade school as fact, scientifically proven, and distinct from any other suggestion about the origin of life.  The Humanists who achieved this undisputed championship of heavyweight ideas, did so with tremendous fervor, subtlety and passion, but it didn’t hurt that the US Federal government was in their corner.  Of course, they are not going to be convinced by anything that their faith in “science” is flawed.  Almost all scientific discovery is put through tremendous critique by other scientists in order to satisfy its truth.  This process has weeded out many false discoveries and exposed errors.  Evolution has been criticized by Christians, but its promotors have rallied groups of scientists to defend it rather than perform the normal verification processes.  I have friends who are recognized and respected scientists who speak of the bias and blind acceptance that has been attributed by the scientific community to evolution.  It is the sacred cow of the academic scientific community and they defend their faith vehemently.

The important debate is between Christians who hold to a literal interpretation of Genesis with a young earth position and those who interpret Genesis less literally, yet true, equally admitting God as Creator, but granting a much older earth. Were Believers able to unite under a banner of Creator God, Evolution theory might be exposed by true science as the fraud it actually is, being contrary to the physical laws of nature, having fraudulent links between species, the hoax of primordial soups sufficiency, lacking mathematically sound time frames of permutation, unexplained rationale of observed design complexity, and a myriad of other deficiencies that render Evolution as a very unsound, largely disproved theory.  Is it more important to rid the secular educational system of the lie of evolution or continue to demand that faith in our Creator be taught as well?  Some consider it demeaning to consider Christian faith a mere alternative with secular humanistic evolution.  Finally, recent verification of the Big Bang theory has pointed to the necessity of an initiator/Creator, which standing alone undermines evolution as an origin of life.

This brings us to the other glaring issue that is misrepresented in this movie – the normal secular College experience will destroy a Christians tender faith.  The quote, “Bad company corrupts good morals” is true, but Believers have far more to offer the inquisitive collegiate than the world.  Moreover, God watches over those who belong to Him and He that is within us is greater than he who is in the world.  Believers are the salt of the earth and release saving power as they go. Scriptures do not recommend close relationships with unbelievers (2 Cor. 6: 14), but that does not mean we are to hide in fear or avoid acquaintance with our fellow man.  God is well able to strengthen faith during the college experience.  In fact through recent years college campus organizations like Campus Crusade of Christ, YWAM, and many others have strengthened collegiate young tremendously.  In real life God is Sovereign and triumphant over the world’s corruption and deceit.  Believers have every reason to be bold and trust in God’s lovingkindness and saving assurance.

Fossil Fuel Fraud

How many trillions of barrels, each containing fifty-five gallons of crude oil, have been pumped out of the earth?  This is the problem that the Democrat, Socialist, Liberal and Humanist are now complaining about and basing their predictions of future destruction upon.  Who put these trillions of gallons of oil in the earth?  Why was it developed and exploited and why did those who did so get very rich?  Why is oil the catalyst for growth of all industrialized countries?  What types of economies, life styles, health and longevity existed before the industrial age which were spawned by fossil fuels?  Fossil fuels have given the world great prosperity in all these spheres.  Before its advent wood and charcoal were burned to pollute the air and deforestation was rampant, poverty widespread, and life span fifty eight percent of what it is today.  If you want to know how hard life was just over a hundred years ago, turn off your electricity, gas and water.  I can assure you that in a few hours you will be ready to return to the age of Fossil fuel. Those who want to send Americans back to poverty, do not expect to do so themselves.

Today the ‘so-called’ scientists, politicians, and Humanist religious zealots are continuing their false prophecies of doomsday.  They have a consistently wrong track record and therefore should be ignored and discredited.  They are responsible for the prophecy of world-wide nuclear destruction in the 1950’s and 60’s.  For years in the 70’s they promoted world-wide destruction due to overpopulation.  More recently they have predicted world destruction from mass disease pandemic by strains of mutant pathogens that can not be cured.  Today, they are predicting the world will be uninhabitable in twelve years due to global warming, which has now been renamed “climate change” when it was proven there was no global warming.

When will we discredit and denounce these lying prognosticators?  They maintain that the one universal cause of all these world ending devastations is mankind or our unrighteous energy behavior.  These doomsayers blame everyone who is not willing to agree with them.  Moreover, they take no responsibility as humans for their own actions that contribute to world annihilation.  They don’t see their hypocrisy or don’t care, in fact, they likely do not even believe their own ramblings.  We should avoid polluting our air, water, and environment, but that is not the issue with these doomsayers.  They have political/religious power ambitions that drive their rhetoric which is all the more reason to resist and denounce them.

The earth has a changing cycle of warming and cooling caused by natural forces that are much greater than any combined human action over decades.  The sun’s activity changes over time, even a slight change by the sun’s standard has a great impact on earth.  Also, the oceans are vast and generate massive amounts of CO2 gases that impact the earth’s atmosphere, more than mankind could generated in decades.  CO2 is not a pollutant, it is required by all green plants and trees, which in turn produce oxygen.  Finally, volcanoes, hurricanes and lightning all have large impacts in our atmosphere and each is beyond man’s ability to effect to any degree.  This should be evidence enough that we can not influence the world’s climate by our actions, either for destructive or repairing purposes.

When a person’s motives are presented, but later they are found to be contrary to that which was disclosed, we call that person a liar and fraud.  Liars and frauds are normally punished by penalty of law, but even where their deception does not rise to the level of illegality society discredits and distrusts such persons.  It it past time to discredit and never trust these climate change frauds, even those who have been unwittingly duped by the leading schemers.  Simple common sense is enough to see that China, Russia, and other countries pollute far more than America, but America is the focal point for all climate change retaliation action.  It doesn’t take scientific research to reveal this fraud.

Birth Order

There is a theory that common personality preferences exist among people based on whether they were first born, last born, only child, or middle child.  The general public believes this theory is true.  My wife is a great advocate of this theory and uses it to explain conflicts and preferences she observes in our children and grandchildren.  Psychological experts do not acknowledge any factual reality to this theory as it presumably can not be proven as a certainty.  However, I believe there are distinctions that are produced from within the family dynamic.  Every family varies in its strengths, weaknesses, and overall characteristics.  Nevertheless, birth order is consistent.  Jewish law recognized birth order regarding  inheritance tradition, giving the birth right to the first born. Moreover, the first born belonged to God and was to be redeemed, whether the first born of flocks and herds or children.

The common personality traits are as follows: First born – Natural leader, ambitious, responsible; Middle Child – Social butterfly, peacekeeper, fairness-obsessed; Baby – Free spirit, risk taker, charming.  Several other factors can throw off these general tendencies, such as: individual temperament, gender of siblings, physicality (e.g. where one child is much bigger), speciality (e.g. a special talent or ability), and age spacing.  When these other factors are not present, the birth order traits seem to be evident, even stark in some situations.

Rather than judge others, observing these preferences can occasionally help explain different responses and even resolve conflict.  The Briggs-Myers personality type indicator is a test that analyses personality preferences.  It too can provide insight into perspectives that produce drastically different choices.  Also, it reveals some general, although not definitive, differences between men and women.  Similarly, the First Born might clash with each other when they are married.  This is not to suggest they shouldn’t marry, only that recognizing the traits may help resolve conflict, if and when it arises.

We see these distinctions in our children, their spouses, and our grandchildren.  I believe the Middle Child needs a little extra attention as the oldest and baby often demand it ahead of them.  Where a First Born marries a Baby things are usually more harmonious than between two First Borns, but we are so complex no one can be dogmatic about birth order. Consider King David who was the baby of many siblings and he became a great warrior and leader.  I think its good to consider birth order one of the blessings of the family which is the foundation of any healthy society.  God uses everyone and designed us with our own distinctive characteristics.  Even within the same family we grow within an environment that impacts our perspectives and preferences.  Our creator is a personal God, though He is unchanging in perfection, and we are temporal in this life, but believers look forward to eternal live in God’s presence.

Correcting the Record

Imagine if your child came home from school and told you that the best thing to do when you get cut is to put cow dunk on it and bleed a lot if you have a fever.  This is where we are in public education today.  All but the very oldest people alive today were taught in public educational institutions that the theory of evolution had been established as fact, based on scientist’s ability to fashion a primordial soup of amino acids from primary elements.  From these amino acids they affirmed that life evolved through infinite permutations by random chance.  Since the 1980’s evidence has been mounting that the universe was created/initiated in a big bang that developed all the existing stars, galaxies, nebulae, quasars, comets, planets, astroids, moons, and black holes in their current expanding order.  Halley’s discovery of red shift validated and supported Einstein’s theory of relativity and the general laws of thermodynamics and astrophysic observations to date.  Most importantly critical is that factual evidence supporting the Big Bang points to a beginning of the universe.  Most estimates of this beginning reach a time frame of approximately fifteen billion years.

The critical premise of evolution is that the universe is static and infinite.  In other words, the universe as we see it today has always existed.  This is necessary to allow enough time for random chance to form everything in perfect sequence and order to spawn single cell life and have it evolve into everything we see today.  This time frame must be infinite, because it is far greater than the chance of rolling a million dice at one once and having each die land on one as each dice must land on one in several consecutive rolls.  Yes, in an infinite universe this could happen, but not in a universe that is only fifteen billion years old.  Therefore, evolution is disproven as an explanation for the source of life.  It may be that various species have mutated into variations of their original nature, but we have never observed the creation of a new species in human history.  Mathematics has proven that the theory of evolution is false because our universe had a beginning which is far too recent to allow for evolution theory.

Today, all teaching and references to evolution theory should be eliminated from all public educational institutions, from all nature videos, from all scientific communications that are not devoted to scientific history and the vast number of flawed and disproven theories proposed in the old days.  Many science texts must be discarded lest we teach a form of humanistic religion that clings to a false idea.  Even before the evidence and observations we have today evolution theory had a serious weakness in its supporting factual basis, i.e. none existed.  It requires too much faith to believe a wrist watch could randomly be created by happenstance while the human and biological existence around us is far more complex than a wrist watch.  Such faith proceeded from Secular Humanism that requires an explanation, irrespective of whether it contradicts the laws of general relativity or thermodynamics, that nothing was created and there is no creator/initiator. It is now time to correct the record, disavow and debunk evolution theory.  Those who hang on to these false notions can join others  who think the earth is flat, it is the center of the universe, the sun orbits the earth, and it rests upon the shoulders of four great elephants. 

The Fingerprint of God

If this being is omnipotent, then every occurrence, including every human action, every human thought, every human feeling and aspiration is also His work; how is it possible to think of holding men responsible for their deeds and thoughts before such an almighty Being?  In giving out punishment and rewards he would to a certain extent be passing judgment on Himself.  How can this be combined with the goodness and righteousness ascribed to Him. –Albert Einstein.

Scientists (and atheists and agnostics) who refuse to accept the abundant evidence which establishes there is a Creator, do so because they falsely judge God Himself, rather than refute the evidence.  They continue to devise more and more bizarre loopholes to escape these findings, but these are always refuted by observations, facts and measurement.  Hugh Ross’ book titled as above, lays out a history of cosmology, the study of the origin and development of the universe, beginning with the Chinese and Mesopotamian’s some six thousand years ago through today.  He also compares theological based conclusions with those of Scientists.  Both have been very wrong regarding their cosmology, but stubborn to concede the truth.  He points out that the scientists have proved the more stubborn of the two.

For the longest time it was thought the universe was eternal and fixed.  This spawned evolution theory based on spontaneous generation through random chance.  As evidence of Scientist’s stubbornness evolution still floats around even though it is statistically impossible.  However, the evidence for a big bang event and a still expanding universe refutes a static eternal theory and establishes a fixed beginning of the universe.  Based on all estimates, there is not adequate time from this beginning to allow mathematically, random chance events to all perfectly happen in required sequence to generate all things we now see.  This beginning corroborates the existence of an outside creator/initiator.  Many other theories and undefined factors have been proposed to negate the inevitable conclusion of God, but they do not hold true. Einstein invented his “cosmological constant” to preserve a static universe.  In 1931, following Hubble’s publication on the law of red shifts, he discarded his constant conceding that its introduction was “the greatest mistake of his life.”

This book is a remarkable primer for anyone who questions the veracity of scientific cosmology.  It also addresses the apparent conflicts between the Genesis accounts in the Bible and scientific evidence, and the seeming paradox that obstructs so many, like Einstein, who could not find God just on his terms.  The Bible states, “The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of people, who suppress the truth by their wickedness, since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them.  For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualitieshis eternal power and divine naturehave been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.” (Romans 1: 18-20).  Even without today’s scientific discoveries about the universe, God has revealed His existence.  How gracious God is to give us through science such insight and further proof of His Creative work.

More Science Fiction

I have always enjoyed a good science fiction story, but to be good it must have a device to make it plausible. C.S. Lewis wrote a science fiction trilogy with the first book, “Out of the Silent Planet”, published in 1938. It employed an anti-gravity coating on a space ship that enabled space travel to the moon. This device gives the reader freedom to accept the rest of the story.

Today, the Democrat Party is promoting its own version of science fiction as did its leader, Barack Hussein Obama, but with less imagination. Obama forced the market to discontinue the incandescent light bulb that cost $0.25 each, for fluorescent bulbs costing $7.00, or more. The lie was that these new bulbs would last seven years or more and use less energy. They did consume less energy, but also produced less light and usually didn’t last any longer that normal bulbs. Obama’s market manipulation cost every American hundreds of dollars. Just a few years later real science perfected the LED bulb that is extremely efficient, super long-lasting, and becoming inexpensive. Obama’s other disaster was with the electric car, where he spent untold billions to fund car manufacturers who built electric cars and recharging stations everywhere that now only serve as parking barriers. This scheme was a massive waste of public funds. A true and complete audit of these funds would explain, in part, what happened with the ten trillion dollars Obama incurred in his transformation of America fantasy.

Today, a new generation of young democrat imbeciles are doubling down on Obama’s failures in the hope that they can totally bankrupt the nation through utter socialistic failure. Among their fantastic ideas are rebuilding entire cities, abandoning air traffic, and writing tyrannical laws that tell everyone what they can and can not eat, and provide everything to everyone. The science fiction they promote is that human action is causing the world to overheat and be destroyed in twelve years or so. This fiction is simply not plausible. It is well known that there are variations in climate, even in the relatively short period that reliable measurements have been recorded, yet the earth endures. The oceans and other natural sources produce more greenhouse gases than mankind, and it has been on-going for thousands of years. Many extreme records are historic, before the wide-spread advent of the internal combustion engine. So, their fantasy is not appealing to anyone who requires plausible arguments supported by fact or even a reasonable excuse.

These same people are exploring alternatives for migrating to other planets, and while space travel is not a new fantasy, it was always predicated on mankind’s increasing knowledge and desire to explore – never as an escape. In Star Trek, Star Fleet and the admiralty remained on earth. If we can travel to other planets where there is no atmosphere, no natural resource, no water, can we not much more easily engineer a way to clean the air, water, and use the remaining renewable resources on earth, thus saving ourselves a dangerous trip to the hell waiting on mars. The like-minded billionaires are funding the space escape research so that the elite socialists can survive. They prefer that rhetoric alone be given in support of the world’s poor, instead of using their money to provide clean sources of drinking water, agricultural and medical assistance, for which christian organizations are well known. Israelis have developed reverse osmosis desalination technology and are now able to provide fresh water from the sea at a cost of $0.58, per cubit meter, what one person uses a week. The barrier to cleaning CO2 from the atmosphere is that it is naturally occurring and therefore too vast and is no threat.

Everyone will be leaving earth whether upon the Messiah’s return or within the eighty or so years of life they are given. Join with those who help their fellow man. Ignore the doomsayers and their ridiculous causes and contrived solutions that are actually a ruse to bring masses of unwitting fools into captivity. Yeshua, (Jesus Hebrew name), is the Truth and His words lead to life evermore. It’s not a fiction, but quite plausible given that He is God in the flesh, rose from the dead and lives evermore. Read for yourself the story that has been retained, uncorrupted and is irrefutable for over two thousand years, in the Bible. The most widespread book ever, a supernatural wonder retained with exact precision over five thousand years. Few things on earth have endured so long, certainly no other book.

Faulty Humans

We watched a movie entitled “The Experimenter”, based on a true story of social behavioral experiments conducted in 1961, by psychiatrist Dr. Stanley Milgram.  The movie was OK, if you are interested in mind games or psychology, but I found an aspect in the background that was startling.  Dr. Milgram devised a test to see how far people would go when given instructions by an authority figure.  It involved one person, the teacher, giving negative feedback to another, the student, via electric shocks for each wrong answer.  There weren’t any real shocks, but the teachers were led to believe they were and the voltage increased with each successive wrong answer until the student requested that they wanted to quit and eventually fell silent from the pain.  The result was that almost every Teacher kept giving the shocks, even when the student begged with screams of pain for them to stop.  Each teacher became uncomfortable and concerned, but they were reassured by the observing test official that no permanent damage would result, he accepted the responsibility, the teacher had agreed to follow through and must complete the test.  After it was over each participant was shown that no shocks were actually given and it had only been a test of whether they would comply with authority or follow their own sense of right and responsibility.

The results were compiled in a book and it illustrated a serious flaw in humanity – susceptibility of being deceived into harming others.  The year 1961 was just a few years after the holocaust, and the same time the Nazi general Eichmann was captured and tried in Israel for war crimes.  This experiment validated how so many ordinary Germans were led by Hitler’s Third Reich to kill millions of innocent people.  Dr. Milgram taught and conducted his experiments at Harvard University. When his report was published the Harvard hierarchy objected to his methods, tests, and results.  They attempted to discredit his findings and refused to grant him tenure, so he left.  His work was eventually acknowledged as ground breaking and became a topic in every beginning psychology class.

What startled me was Harvard’s response.  They represent the epitome of higher education, the school of the ruling class, and the cathedral of humanistic liberalism.  They could not abide a study that proved an inherent flaw of evil in mankind. Moreover, they sought with great fervor to cause Dr. Milgram to withdraw his findings.  Rather than accept the very carefully controlled scientific approach and unbiased result, Harvard followed its liberal bias.

The experiment revealed a human weakness, that we will cause great harm to others if we relinquish our responsibility to another who accepts authority.  Of course, that is never an excuse or justification for our actions.  The actions of Harvard revealed that humanistic liberalism will reject proven scientific fact in favor of its bias and political agenda.  To the extent humans are found to be flawed, humanistic faith is equally flawed.  Moreover, the teaching of the Bible is shown true and the need of a Savior/Redeemer/Sovereign God is essential.

The Global Warming Hoax

In the last few years a number of scientists and politicians have warned about the earth warming unnaturally and the catastrophes that will occur as a result.  Some politicians recently have suggested that the earth will be destroyed within just 12 years.  As many of these people are from the fascist left it is not surprising that they are not willing to hear any other point of view from other scientists who disagree with their conclusions but rather try to shame them with the label “denier”.

Recent global warming agreements brokered by the United Nation seek steep reductions in world CO2 output to slow the presumed warming of the earth’s atmosphere, while also seeking alterations in the economy that would move energy sources away from fossil fuels toward renewable natural energy.  But a growing contingent of scientists and economists call into question the climate change dogma, saying that the temperature data show no clear recent warming and noting that the benefits of global warming, if it existed, might be greater than the costs.

Scientists at NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies in New York claim the past five years are, collectively, the warmest years in the modern record.  However, Marc Morano in his The Politically Incorrect Guide to Climate Change gives evidence thatassuming it is even possible to accurately calculate global temperature data, we are talking about differences in global temperature so tiny that they are smaller than the error margins: so, in scientific terms, unreliable to the point of uselessness.  According to Mr. Morano, an increasing number of climate scientists now conclude that there is no empirical evidence of human-caused global warming.  There are only computer model speculations that humans are causing it, and every forecast made using these models since 1990 has been wrong – with actual temperatures getting further from predictions with every passing year.

A recent study, based on a climate model, claimed the oceans had retained 60% more warming than previously thought.  The study itself, by no fewer than ten authors, made sweeping claims.  Media around the world seized upon the report as yet another indicator of climate-change doom and runaway global warming.  The only problem: The study made a crucial math error as noted by British climate scientist Nicholas Lewis.  The study’s conclusions were invalidated and the authors of the study agreed that the study was flawed.

The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which has issued a number of alarming reports on global warming over the years, has used literally dozens of different models to confirm their dire forecasts. The models are different in some respects, but all share one big problem in common: They can’t even accurately predict what has already happened, much less forecast what will happen in the deep future.  Another study by Lewis and climate scientist Judith Curry in the American Meteorological Society’s journal estimated that a doubling of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere would result in temperatures of anywhere from 30% to 45% below UN estimates.  In other words, no global warming crisis exists.

In short, if there is a global warming crisis it is not because any study or scientist has proven it so.  This makes suppression of opposing views on climate change rather unscientific.  More troubling are the liberals who are pushing global warming, the same types who are always trying to find excuses for more control over our lives with corresponding less freedom for all.  The latest ridiculous Green New Deal proposed legislation would abolish fossil fuels, effectively eliminating cars and planes.  Although it currently has no chance of passing, it illustrates how far the socialist left will go to control every aspect of our life.



The Creator and the Cosmos

This book by Hugh Ross, Ph.d. is well written and interesting.  It discusses astrophysics in a way that is understandable even though it goes into considerable depth.  Dr. Ross is a believer and a cosmologist and theoretician.  This was the third edition which included many recent updates. The Big Bang theory and recent discoveries related to it have transformed thinking on the origin of the universe and the existence of a Creator.  Those who are opposed to God in any concept are scrambling to craft new arguments against the Big Bang theory.  This book explains evidence for and defense of the Big Bang theory based on existing observations, measurements, rationale of general relativity, and the laws of thermonuclear dynamics.

The first three chapters outline the nature of the issue and current scientific conclusions.  Chapters four through eight are a little technical, but that must be accepted with such a complex subject.  However, the last chapters are outstanding.  Dr. Ross does not approach the origin of the universe from a theological or philosophical perspective, but from a scientific one.  Yet, as a Believer, he is able to illustrate how the biblical account of creation describes what astrophysics actually observes and how a hot Big Bang creation event points to a Creator God.  For example, the Bible says God, “stretched out the Heavens” and science proves the universe is expanding at an increasing rate.

The last chapters are devoted to explaining how today’s unfolding scientific research tends to support the existence of the God of the Bible.  Not only is evolution, random chance, and quantum theory debunked by tested laws of physics, evidence and observation, but new scientific measurements indicate that the level of intelligent design goes beyond what we see on earth, even to the limits of the universe.  In Dr. Ross’ words, unless the entire universe is just as it is, life on earth would not be possible.  Even distant galaxies, giant red stars, quasars, supernovae, and black holes, must all be exactly as they are in order for there to be life on earth.  This is explained in great detail.

He addresses other famous astrophysicists like Einstein, Hubble, Hawkins, Bohr, Sagan, and many I have never heard of explaining the gist of their discoveries, theories, laws of physics, and positions, then describes flaws in their arguments against a beginning of time, the observed universe, and a Creator as described in the Bible.

True science bears witness to God’s glory in creation.  Anyone interested in a reliable analysis of the many theories of creation will like this book.  If you sincerely question whether there is a God behind the universe, read this book.  If you have taken up an offense against God and/or Christians, no book other than the Bible can help you, as it is contains a supernatural message that transcends time and space.  Be at peace, God’s lovingkindness is everlasting, even though time is not.

The Silliest Idea

1*e7nXMQ3v1GlJSYLPMy5Qfw.pngThe idea of a utopia on earth constructed by men is the silliest idea ever.  However long we have lived on earth there has been no utopia.  All the attempts by tyrants, communists, Emperors, dictators, and even well-meaning people can not create perfect order from the brokenness in this world.  It is frightening to consider that men exist who think they can create a utopia through their own wisdom.  This is pride and arrogance at its zenith.

In fact, there are many who believe a utopia is possible.  Secular Humanism teaches that the barrier to human utopia is religion and anyone who opposes secular humanistic reasoning.  They believe man alone is able to create utopia through reason and good intentions.  Many have faith in science as their new god.  I heard an interesting fact recently; meteorologist do not know how or why a cloud forms in a particular place. There is so much that science doesn’t know and can’t explain.  This is the same science that will construct their utopia.

These ideas are propagated by a great evil which declared, “I will ascend above the tops of the clouds; I will make myself like the Most High.” (Isaiah 14: 14).  God created mankind in a paradise, but we were expelled after our disobedience, and we have been disobedient ever since, it is integral in our fallen human nature.  When all prisons are no longer needed and there is no crime, then we can talk about utopia.  The idea of a utopia created and ruled by man is paradoxical, like an oxymoron; flawed imperfect weak men constructing a perfect society filled with imperfect disobedient citizens. Nevertheless, dreamers and fools looked for the fountain of youth, as well.  Utopia on earth is an appeal by Evil promising a knock-off of the real and true heaven, which it can never deliver.  Through such lies it seeks to lure as many as possible into captivity and bondage.

Beware anyone who exalts man as his own god.  There are many deceivers in the world and they favor a secular god of humanist reason, so-called science, and notions of peace built upon a foundation of rebellion, pride, wickedness, and arrogance.  They believe humans are inherently good, in spite of 10,000 years of war, atrocity, genocide, crime, etc.  “Don’t let anyone deceive you in any way, for that day will not come until the rebellion occurs and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the man doomed to destruction. He will oppose and will exalt himself over everything that is called God or is worshiped, so that he sets himself up in God’s temple, proclaiming himself to be God.” (2 Thess. 2: 3-4).

Man as God

39901903-mad-scientistThe earth is like a spinning top tilted on its axis.  The spin gives us day and night, while the tilt provides the seasons.  It’s a good thing our scientist are keeping the earth spinning at just the right speed for us, because if it slowed or stopped we would either bake in the heat or freeze in the dark.  I’m glad our great scientists are keeping the earth’s axis tilted at just the right angle so that the poles neither freeze nor thaw too much.  Oh, that reminds me of the global warming that our scientist are solving by eliminating an insignificant fraction of the CO2 that is produced in the oceans.  I’m so glad that our scientist are able to take us to Mars when we have to leave this planet.  I don’t understand how it is possible for them to create an atmosphere on Mars, rather than simply clean the existing atmosphere here on earth, but they must know everything.  I also don’t understand how they know so much about the other planets, yet haven’t even explored the oceans of this earth, but they can do anything they set their minds to – Right?

Look at how great our human society has become, in spite of war, crime, hunger and famine, political corruption, murder, suicide, government sanctioned genocide, disease, terrorism, disasters like tornadoes, hurricanes, earthquakes, floods, and volcanos.  Well, I guess we can’t blame all that on our scientists, but if they are as smart as they claim, why can’t they solve these issues too.  I think many blame religion for most of the bad things that happen, but wasn’t it Gandhi that popularized passive resistance and peaceful protest.  Wasn’t Martin Luther King, Jr. a Christian preacher who promoted peace, non-violent protests and forgiveness.  Wasn’t Jesus the one who preached love and submission; who taught His followers to love their enemies and treat others as you want to be treated.  Wasn’t it communism, fascists, and dictators who gave us the greatest genocide ever in Russia, China, and Germany.  Well our scientists have given us abortion that has eclipsed all killing and continues at the rate of three million per year.  If it wasn’t for their opinion that the baby in the mother’s womb is only a mass of tissue, these babies would be born.

Of course scientific knowledge is put to good use like medical science, that was originally instituted in Christian hospitals, universities and organizations.  However, the scientists we can trust are the ones who know that we evolved from cells in the ocean and assure us that there are many other inhabited planets in our galaxy and universe and they all were created by random happenstance.  The most ancient and widespread book is not scientific, it says, “The fool says in his heart, ‘There is no God.’ ” (Psalm 53: 1).

Observations on Evolution

CKsZrMSUsAIaa3x.jpg“By faith we understand that the universe was created by the word of God, so that what is seen was not made out of things that are visible.”  Hebrews 11:3.

In the essay “Is Theology Poetry” C. S. Lewis discusses his view of the universal evolution theory  – “By universal evolutionism I mean the belief that the very formula of universal process is from imperfect to perfect, from small beginnings to great endings, from the rudimentary to the elaborate, the belief which makes people find it natural to think that morality springs from savage taboos, adult sentiment from infantile Continue reading

National Catastrophe

UnknownI’m hearing a lot about potential catastrophic events that seem imminent and serious. First, I heard sometime ago that our entire water, food, financial, communication, and energy infrastructure could be permanently disabled by a cyber attack or an EMP, (electro magnetic pulse).  It is estimated that this catastrophe would result in the death of 90% of the US population within one year.  The second catastrophe I heard was of a large volcanic crevasse which opened in the Yellowstone National Park that is indicative of an eruption of a massive volcano under Yellowstone.  This volcanic area is the largest in the nation and would make the explosion of Mt. Saint Helens seem 

Continue reading


jw_12A bird has a sense of equilibrium in their head that enables the bird to maintain its head in a fixed position irrespective of the bird’s body, wings, tail and feet.  This is necessary as the bird flies by moving and positioning it’s wings and tail separately. We are made to travel with feet fixed to the ground, so our equilibrium is referenced to the ground rather than the air.  Of course we can fly, swim, dive, roll, climb and move in almost any manner with the devices and instrumentation that we have invented.  We were made by God to rule over all the creatures of the earth.  The animals have a distinct fear of man accordingly.  There is no animal that lives off humans as its prey. The closest

Continue reading


ClMr788WkAAX7pwIt was asserted that Sigmund Freud didn’t attempt to cure his neurotic patients through psychoanalysis, but merely help them to accept the world as it is.  He was not a believer – an agnostic, but he properly assessed the capability of man.  To heal is the work of God, which He accomplishes through doctors, right living, and his miraculous intervention. Just because He uses men in His work, the cure does not cease being His.  Just as the prophetic word (1 Cor. 14: 24-25), preaching, acts of lovingkindness, or teaching may be used of God in His work – salvation is through God alone. Continue reading

The Power of Chance

ab1e99750fd30cab5e29c4201ca9a8b5--creation-vs-evolution-darwin-evolutionEveryone seems to agree that in chance there is hidden great power. The theory of evolution is based on chance events that happen randomly over millions of years. This theory is now generally accepted as fact and forms a basis for the origin of species. I was watching a nature show recently that cited certain animal species that evolved to live on land, but rejected it and returned to the sea. Perhaps this explains the large brain and mental capacity of dolphins that breathe air and are mammals like humans. Could they be the missing link? Might humans be the predecessors of dolphins? Did early men slithered upon shore, become upright, become apes, then a portion of them dove back into the sea and evolved into dolphins? Maybe the laughing sound they make is their laughing at us for remaining Continue reading

Observations on Evolution

weighingcreation“By faith we understand that the universe was created by the word of God, so that what is seen was not made out of things that are visible.”  Hebrews 11:3.

In the essay “Is Theology Poetry” C. S. Lewis discusses his view of the universal evolution theory  – “By universal evolutionism I mean the belief that the very formula of universal process is from imperfect to perfect, from small beginnings to great endings, from the rudimentary to the elaborate, the belief which makes people Continue reading

The Sky Is Falling

images“The sky if falling.”  Chicken Little uttered these words over and over and some began to believe her.  The lost (an acceptable biblical term referring to those who do not currently believe in God) spew forth a seemingly endless list of pending doom for this world.  Here is a brief incomplete list:

– Nuclear Destruction

– Over population growth

– Global climate change

– Asteroid collisions with earth

– Comet collision with earth

– World wide disease epidemics

– Starvation through genetic tampering

– Poisoning of all air and water

There are other items Continue reading

This is Not Rocket Science

22I saw a very serious report on a major network national news segment discussing the plans necessary to inhabit Mars as an alternative to Earth.  Mars is a dry rock, without a breathable atmosphere, and incapable of sustaining any existing life.  Simple common sense shows there is no possibility of making it habitable.  The soil and environment will not grow any existing life.  Even in a worse case scenario , it would be much easier to clean up earth, all its water, all its air, all its soil, rather than attempt… Continue reading