Image someone defending Nazi’s saying, “What Nazis [Hamas] did was horrific and there’s no justification for it. And what is also true is that the defense against them [so called occupation], and what’s happening to Nazi supporters [Palestinians], is unbearable.”
Obama clearly has a preference for the enemies of Israel and is opposed to Jews. Was his training/education in Islam the source of these preferences? While President he was hostile toward Netanyahu chiding him publicly. Now he pretends to find a middle ground, but middle ground with anyone committed to another parties annihilation is impossible, as decades of negotiation and peace offers have demonstrated. Israel understands that Hamas will never be satisfied until they are defeated. Gaza was a product of such flawed reasoning as Obama and his ilk propose – the self governing state of Gaza. Hamas [Nazis] took over with approval of the Gazan people and the Muslim world.
This war is not about Israel’s treatment of Gazan refugees, which no Arab nation has been willing to accept. Instead, they are used as captive pawns of Hamas who are sworn to Israels annihilation. In 1945, the world rendered judgment upon Nazis – defeat and eradication. Today, no other judgment can be rendered to Hamas, who still holds over two hundred hostages from around the world, are still battling Israel, and are using the Gazan people as captive human shields. Why would anyone accept such flawed, biased, and ridiculous statements in support of Hamas, unless like so many, perhaps Obama, they actually want the Israelis destroyed? Just leaders do not negotiate with terrorists, kidnappers and evil lunatics for valid reasons.
Perhaps we should apply Obamas own rationale to him. What he says in support of Hamas is horrific and there is no justification for it, and what is also true is that his attempts to portray himself reasonable to both sides is unbearable. Obama has a long history as a community organizer to bring division and raise issues with casual remarks that are incendiary. His comment regarding a young Black man who was brutally assaulting a hispanic man and was killed in self defense, was racially motivated suggesting he would have looked like Obama’s son. For a sitting President to interject such comments before any investigation was completed was reckless and biased. His comments in defense of Hamas are similarly reckless and biased. He is not an objective person as his history and past behavior clearly indicate. How can we conclude he is anything other than a divisive force seeking to foment hatred, rather than peace?
Discover more from The Conservative Christian Apologist
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
