Political Pollution

Political pollution is spreading all around our society, no longer contained in election cycles. It has seeped into sports and now the weather reports are getting littered with political crud. What can we do about this uncontained refuse that spoils all it touches. It is like an oily substance covering areas and choking out life. Only strong detoxification can remove it, but the wildlife does not readily submit to the cleansing process.

Some have said, “Everything is politics”, but the politics of division, victimization, and government tyranny are toxic, full of hatred, designed to make only captives. The various spheres that make up our society are under attack by this political pollution.  News has become bigotry, propaganda, and fabrication to support the daily narrative that comes down from the power elite to a compromised biased media.  Sports are corrupted by side agendas touting accusations and promoting their political trash.  For example, the success of the American women’s soccer team was high-jacked by a few team member’s for political activism purposes. The challenges of competition, mastery of physical precision and cunning strategy are lost in the folly of political correctness.

The weather is no longer about the changing temperature, precipitation and coming weather events; it is cluttered with the debris of climate change and political messages crying, “the sky is falling”. Recently  Entertainment has become the home of smut, but it is also flooded with refuse from those who think they are better than everyone else and preach their idolatry of fascist socialism. Some actors proclaim themselves experts and make a show with appearances before Congress arguing against liberty and traditional values. While every citizen has the privilege of political exercise, the Constitution does not sanction disproportionate representation for the elite or the establishment of a political upper class, as we see emerging today. Even religious circles are full of political trash as well, but the true Church does not abide among these political zealots masquerading as church leaders.

I don’t believe the founders could have imagined any of this, but they established safeguards for liberty against the forces of tyranny. John Adams observed, “We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion.  Our constitution was made for a moral and religious people… it is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” James Madison said, “The advancement and diffusion of knowledge is the only guardian of true liberty.” Clearly, he had no idea of a society who’s media was full of lies, half-truths, and unceasingly bias.

Is it time to break up the oligarchy of media platforms through enforcement of longstanding anti-trust law? The slow creep of these media monopolies has choked the freedom from public discourse and thwarted the penalties for dishonesty and deceit.  Open and unhindered competition is a guardian of our national debate which is conducted on electronic forums that are the public square.  These few oligarchs are removing speech they consider opposed to their private purposes. They have instituted programs and algorithms to further their own political agendas that are contrary to the principles of a free press.  History clearly teaches us that demigods, dictators, and oppressive communist regimes first eliminate a free and open press, stifle all dissent, and rewrite history itself. How can we continue on a path of greatness when it has become so littered with political pollution?

Fossil Fuel Fraud

How many trillions of barrels, each containing fifty-five gallons of crude oil, have been pumped out of the earth?  This is the problem that the Democrat, Socialist, Liberal and Humanist are now complaining about and basing their predictions of future destruction upon.  Who put these trillions of gallons of oil in the earth?  Why was it developed and exploited and why did those who did so get very rich?  Why is oil the catalyst for growth of all industrialized countries?  What types of economies, life styles, health and longevity existed before the industrial age which were spawned by fossil fuels?  Fossil fuels have given the world great prosperity in all these spheres.  Before its advent wood and charcoal were burned to pollute the air and deforestation was rampant, poverty widespread, and life span fifty eight percent of what it is today.  If you want to know how hard life was just over a hundred years ago, turn off your electricity, gas and water.  I can assure you that in a few hours you will be ready to return to the age of Fossil fuel. Those who want to send Americans back to poverty, do not expect to do so themselves.

Today the ‘so-called’ scientists, politicians, and Humanist religious zealots are continuing their false prophecies of doomsday.  They have a consistently wrong track record and therefore should be ignored and discredited.  They are responsible for the prophecy of world-wide nuclear destruction in the 1950’s and 60’s.  For years in the 70’s they promoted world-wide destruction due to overpopulation.  More recently they have predicted world destruction from mass disease pandemic by strains of mutant pathogens that can not be cured.  Today, they are predicting the world will be uninhabitable in twelve years due to global warming, which has now been renamed “climate change” when it was proven there was no global warming.

When will we discredit and denounce these lying prognosticators?  They maintain that the one universal cause of all these world ending devastations is mankind or our unrighteous energy behavior.  These doomsayers blame everyone who is not willing to agree with them.  Moreover, they take no responsibility as humans for their own actions that contribute to world annihilation.  They don’t see their hypocrisy or don’t care, in fact, they likely do not even believe their own ramblings.  We should avoid polluting our air, water, and environment, but that is not the issue with these doomsayers.  They have political/religious power ambitions that drive their rhetoric which is all the more reason to resist and denounce them.

The earth has a changing cycle of warming and cooling caused by natural forces that are much greater than any combined human action over decades.  The sun’s activity changes over time, even a slight change by the sun’s standard has a great impact on earth.  Also, the oceans are vast and generate massive amounts of CO2 gases that impact the earth’s atmosphere, more than mankind could generated in decades.  CO2 is not a pollutant, it is required by all green plants and trees, which in turn produce oxygen.  Finally, volcanoes, hurricanes and lightning all have large impacts in our atmosphere and each is beyond man’s ability to effect to any degree.  This should be evidence enough that we can not influence the world’s climate by our actions, either for destructive or repairing purposes.

When a person’s motives are presented, but later they are found to be contrary to that which was disclosed, we call that person a liar and fraud.  Liars and frauds are normally punished by penalty of law, but even where their deception does not rise to the level of illegality society discredits and distrusts such persons.  It it past time to discredit and never trust these climate change frauds, even those who have been unwittingly duped by the leading schemers.  Simple common sense is enough to see that China, Russia, and other countries pollute far more than America, but America is the focal point for all climate change retaliation action.  It doesn’t take scientific research to reveal this fraud.

The Global Warming Hoax

In the last few years a number of scientists and politicians have warned about the earth warming unnaturally and the catastrophes that will occur as a result.  Some politicians recently have suggested that the earth will be destroyed within just 12 years.  As many of these people are from the fascist left it is not surprising that they are not willing to hear any other point of view from other scientists who disagree with their conclusions but rather try to shame them with the label “denier”.

Recent global warming agreements brokered by the United Nation seek steep reductions in world CO2 output to slow the presumed warming of the earth’s atmosphere, while also seeking alterations in the economy that would move energy sources away from fossil fuels toward renewable natural energy.  But a growing contingent of scientists and economists call into question the climate change dogma, saying that the temperature data show no clear recent warming and noting that the benefits of global warming, if it existed, might be greater than the costs.

Scientists at NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies in New York claim the past five years are, collectively, the warmest years in the modern record.  However, Marc Morano in his The Politically Incorrect Guide to Climate Change gives evidence thatassuming it is even possible to accurately calculate global temperature data, we are talking about differences in global temperature so tiny that they are smaller than the error margins: so, in scientific terms, unreliable to the point of uselessness.  According to Mr. Morano, an increasing number of climate scientists now conclude that there is no empirical evidence of human-caused global warming.  There are only computer model speculations that humans are causing it, and every forecast made using these models since 1990 has been wrong – with actual temperatures getting further from predictions with every passing year.

A recent study, based on a climate model, claimed the oceans had retained 60% more warming than previously thought.  The study itself, by no fewer than ten authors, made sweeping claims.  Media around the world seized upon the report as yet another indicator of climate-change doom and runaway global warming.  The only problem: The study made a crucial math error as noted by British climate scientist Nicholas Lewis.  The study’s conclusions were invalidated and the authors of the study agreed that the study was flawed.

The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which has issued a number of alarming reports on global warming over the years, has used literally dozens of different models to confirm their dire forecasts. The models are different in some respects, but all share one big problem in common: They can’t even accurately predict what has already happened, much less forecast what will happen in the deep future.  Another study by Lewis and climate scientist Judith Curry in the American Meteorological Society’s journal estimated that a doubling of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere would result in temperatures of anywhere from 30% to 45% below UN estimates.  In other words, no global warming crisis exists.

In short, if there is a global warming crisis it is not because any study or scientist has proven it so.  This makes suppression of opposing views on climate change rather unscientific.  More troubling are the liberals who are pushing global warming, the same types who are always trying to find excuses for more control over our lives with corresponding less freedom for all.  The latest ridiculous Green New Deal proposed legislation would abolish fossil fuels, effectively eliminating cars and planes.  Although it currently has no chance of passing, it illustrates how far the socialist left will go to control every aspect of our life.



The Sky Is Falling

images“The sky if falling.”  Chicken Little uttered these words over and over and some began to believe her.  The lost (an acceptable biblical term referring to those who do not currently believe in God) spew forth a seemingly endless list of pending doom for this world.  Here is a brief incomplete list:

– Nuclear Destruction

– Over population growth

– Global climate change

– Asteroid collisions with earth

– Comet collision with earth

– World wide disease epidemics

– Starvation through genetic tampering

– Poisoning of all air and water

There are other items Continue reading