Proof of Claim

The majority of the food we eat has seeds in it. These seeds when planted or merely dropped on fertile soil would grow into another plant and eventually produce more food. This relationship between beings and plants on this planet is so remarkable as to indicate intelligent design. This premise with far more and better illustrations was linked to creationism in a US District court, Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, 400 F. Supp. 2d 707 (M.D. Pa. 2005). Can any Court define what is science and what is not? The assumption of the case was that “detailed scientific examination has rebutted the claims that evolutionary explanations are inadequate.” This is a double negative which covertly asserts that science has proved evolution as a fact that is beyond question. Much of the comments about this case relate to the parties, the witnesses, the judge, and everyones beliefs, motives, and intents whether spoken or not. It is a horrible case for that reason, and others, and it should have been about the actual statute that sought to bolster scientific inquiry into alternatives to evolution and open further study into gaps, weaknesses, and uncertainty of evolution as a theory about the origin of life. Most recently science has shown that the universe exploded into existence in what is called the “Big Bang”. This discovery puts evolution theory in great peril as it limits the infinite time upon which evolution theory hindges. 

The greatest hoaxs in evolution’s scientific proof is the so-called “primordial soup”. Carbon-13 to carbon-12 ratio analysis, plus nitrogen-15 to nitrogen-14 ratio analysis on ancient carbonaceous material, further establishes that a primordial soup or mineral substrate of prebiotic molecules, never existed on earth. See Mink T. Rosing, “C-Depleted Carbon Microparticles”, p.674-76; Stephen J. Mojzsis et AL “Evidence for life on earth before 3,800 Million Years Ago”, etc. There are too many other errors and inconsistencies with evolution to enumerate, but the humanist lobby prevents any critique of their foundational theory that for them proves (together with much faith in fake science) there is no God.

In the Pennsylvania Middle District Court, Judge Jones ruled against the defendant, Dover school board, that wanted to add the following statement to their biology curriculum, “Students will be made aware of the gaps/problems in Darwin’s theory and of other theories of evolution including, but not limited to, intelligent design. Note: Origins of life is not taught.” The judge concluded there was evidence to support a verdict that Intelligent Design was equivalent to Creationism, although it was clear that the school board did not believe all existing science comported with evolutionary doctrine. His conclusion that it was equivalent to Creationism linked his decision to the Supreme Court case, Edwards v. Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578 (1987), which declared the teaching of Creationism contrary to the Constitutions Establishment clause.

One important principle that is lost on most people today is that a Federal District Court has jurisdiction in its own district only. The eleven Circuit Courts of Appeal have authority only over their individual regions. There are differences in various districts and occasionally between Circuits. Therefore, the precident of the Kitzmiller case is only controlling in the Middle District of Pennsylvania. Other states and school boards across the nation are free to include in their curriculum encouragement to explore, test, critique and/or otherwise pursue scientific fact and theory that contradicts evolution. In his ruling he failed to adequately address the school boards intent to foster open scientific inquiry and investigation among its students and faculty, but defended a flawed evolution theory and attributed only religious zealotry to the school board.

The forces of secular humanism have established evolution as a secure base for their assualt on truth, free speech, and critique of their fascist ideology. Therefore, any educational authority that chooses to restore a healthy and uncompromising search for truth regarding the origin of life and the cosmos should expect a well organized opposition of evolutionists dogma, propaganda, and media smear tactics. Science is on the side of open analysis, unbiased testing, and search for the truth, not measured by supposed votes of how many so-called experts or scientists believe in evolution, but by the actual cosmos around us, its physical laws, characteristics and nature, seen and unseen. Every student in American public schools must be taught evolution, that everything which exists sprang from nothing through eons of random chance and happenstance such that all the complexity, wisdom, ingenuity, beauty, function and design, and interrelated purpose of all things, even every child is only a freak accident of nature. It’s a lie and most people know it. This is what the Bible says about it. “The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of people, who suppress the truth by their wickedness, since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.” (Romans 1: 18-20).

A Matter of Faith

This 2014 movie is about evolution versus creationism, a topic which few in the secular mainstream would find interesting, but Christians might.  As a “Christian” film it does not have the flash, pomp, and professionalism that fifty million dollars can buy.  Harry Anderson plays a biology professor at a state University who religiously promotes evolution in his classes.  A Christian freshman is confronted with evolution taught as incontrovertible fact while her parents fear that her faith is being destroyed.  Thus, a debate between these two opposing theories for the origin of life ensues.

It is rated 3.7 on IMDB which shocked me as I have seen many 6.5 movies that were much worse than this movie.  Harry Anderson’s acting was outstanding.  The plot did include some worn out stereotypical scenes about college as a faith destroying experience, yet, it had some pleasant surprises as well.  Some reviews criticized the writer for thinking anyone who believes in evolution might be persuaded by this film.  I don’t think that was the intent, rather it was to present evolution as requiring faith just as creationism does.  Christian reviews gave this movie high marks because it was a movie aimed for that audience.

In secular society and the anti-christian media evolution won the debate decades ago.  It is taught even in grade school as fact, scientifically proven, and distinct from any other suggestion about the origin of life.  The Humanists who achieved this undisputed championship of heavyweight ideas, did so with tremendous fervor, subtlety and passion, but it didn’t hurt that the US Federal government was in their corner.  Of course, they are not going to be convinced by anything that their faith in “science” is flawed.  Almost all scientific discovery is put through tremendous critique by other scientists in order to satisfy its truth.  This process has weeded out many false discoveries and exposed errors.  Evolution has been criticized by Christians, but its promotors have rallied groups of scientists to defend it rather than perform the normal verification processes.  I have friends who are recognized and respected scientists who speak of the bias and blind acceptance that has been attributed by the scientific community to evolution.  It is the sacred cow of the academic scientific community and they defend their faith vehemently.

The important debate is between Christians who hold to a literal interpretation of Genesis with a young earth position and those who interpret Genesis less literally, yet true, equally admitting God as Creator, but granting a much older earth. Were Believers able to unite under a banner of Creator God, Evolution theory might be exposed by true science as the fraud it actually is, being contrary to the physical laws of nature, having fraudulent links between species, the hoax of primordial soups sufficiency, lacking mathematically sound time frames of permutation, unexplained rationale of observed design complexity, and a myriad of other deficiencies that render Evolution as a very unsound, largely disproved theory.  Is it more important to rid the secular educational system of the lie of evolution or continue to demand that faith in our Creator be taught as well?  Some consider it demeaning to consider Christian faith a mere alternative with secular humanistic evolution.  Finally, recent verification of the Big Bang theory has pointed to the necessity of an initiator/Creator, which standing alone undermines evolution as an origin of life.

This brings us to the other glaring issue that is misrepresented in this movie – the normal secular College experience will destroy a Christians tender faith.  The quote, “Bad company corrupts good morals” is true, but Believers have far more to offer the inquisitive collegiate than the world.  Moreover, God watches over those who belong to Him and He that is within us is greater than he who is in the world.  Believers are the salt of the earth and release saving power as they go. Scriptures do not recommend close relationships with unbelievers (2 Cor. 6: 14), but that does not mean we are to hide in fear or avoid acquaintance with our fellow man.  God is well able to strengthen faith during the college experience.  In fact through recent years college campus organizations like Campus Crusade of Christ, YWAM, and many others have strengthened collegiate young tremendously.  In real life God is Sovereign and triumphant over the world’s corruption and deceit.  Believers have every reason to be bold and trust in God’s lovingkindness and saving assurance.

The Creator and the Cosmos

This book by Hugh Ross, Ph.d. is well written and interesting.  It discusses astrophysics in a way that is understandable even though it goes into considerable depth.  Dr. Ross is a believer and a cosmologist and theoretician.  This was the third edition which included many recent updates. The Big Bang theory and recent discoveries related to it have transformed thinking on the origin of the universe and the existence of a Creator.  Those who are opposed to God in any concept are scrambling to craft new arguments against the Big Bang theory.  This book explains evidence for and defense of the Big Bang theory based on existing observations, measurements, rationale of general relativity, and the laws of thermonuclear dynamics.

The first three chapters outline the nature of the issue and current scientific conclusions.  Chapters four through eight are a little technical, but that must be accepted with such a complex subject.  However, the last chapters are outstanding.  Dr. Ross does not approach the origin of the universe from a theological or philosophical perspective, but from a scientific one.  Yet, as a Believer, he is able to illustrate how the biblical account of creation describes what astrophysics actually observes and how a hot Big Bang creation event points to a Creator God.  For example, the Bible says God, “stretched out the Heavens” and science proves the universe is expanding at an increasing rate.

The last chapters are devoted to explaining how today’s unfolding scientific research tends to support the existence of the God of the Bible.  Not only is evolution, random chance, and quantum theory debunked by tested laws of physics, evidence and observation, but new scientific measurements indicate that the level of intelligent design goes beyond what we see on earth, even to the limits of the universe.  In Dr. Ross’ words, unless the entire universe is just as it is, life on earth would not be possible.  Even distant galaxies, giant red stars, quasars, supernovae, and black holes, must all be exactly as they are in order for there to be life on earth.  This is explained in great detail.

He addresses other famous astrophysicists like Einstein, Hubble, Hawkins, Bohr, Sagan, and many I have never heard of explaining the gist of their discoveries, theories, laws of physics, and positions, then describes flaws in their arguments against a beginning of time, the observed universe, and a Creator as described in the Bible.

True science bears witness to God’s glory in creation.  Anyone interested in a reliable analysis of the many theories of creation will like this book.  If you sincerely question whether there is a God behind the universe, read this book.  If you have taken up an offense against God and/or Christians, no book other than the Bible can help you, as it is contains a supernatural message that transcends time and space.  Be at peace, God’s lovingkindness is everlasting, even though time is not.

Atheist And Proud Of It, But Why

atheismThis is a partial list of celebrities who are purportedly atheist by News N Buzz website and comments attributed to each.  It is likely profitable to be atheist in Hollywood, so as to the true heart-felt beliefs of these folks, it is hard to say, and since they are alive, they may yet come to faith, particularly, as they age or drop out of the limelight or favor with Hollywood or the political left who seem to run it.  However, these objections to religion and/or God, provide an interesting sample of complaints, demands, dreams, and misunderstandings to support their unbelief.

  • We invented God.  Morgan Freeman