Proof of Claim

The majority of the food we eat has seeds in it. These seeds when planted or merely dropped on fertile soil would grow into another plant and eventually produce more food. This relationship between beings and plants on this planet is so remarkable as to indicate intelligent design. This premise with far more and better illustrations was linked to creationism in a US District court, Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, 400 F. Supp. 2d 707 (M.D. Pa. 2005). Can any Court define what is science and what is not? The assumption of the case was that “detailed scientific examination has rebutted the claims that evolutionary explanations are inadequate.” This is a double negative which covertly asserts that science has proved evolution as a fact that is beyond question. Much of the comments about this case relate to the parties, the witnesses, the judge, and everyones beliefs, motives, and intents whether spoken or not. It is a horrible case for that reason, and others, and it should have been about the actual statute that sought to bolster scientific inquiry into alternatives to evolution and open further study into gaps, weaknesses, and uncertainty of evolution as a theory about the origin of life. Most recently science has shown that the universe exploded into existence in what is called the “Big Bang”. This discovery puts evolution theory in great peril as it limits the infinite time upon which evolution theory hindges. 

The greatest hoaxs in evolution’s scientific proof is the so-called “primordial soup”. Carbon-13 to carbon-12 ratio analysis, plus nitrogen-15 to nitrogen-14 ratio analysis on ancient carbonaceous material, further establishes that a primordial soup or mineral substrate of prebiotic molecules, never existed on earth. See Mink T. Rosing, “C-Depleted Carbon Microparticles”, p.674-76; Stephen J. Mojzsis et AL “Evidence for life on earth before 3,800 Million Years Ago”, etc. There are too many other errors and inconsistencies with evolution to enumerate, but the humanist lobby prevents any critique of their foundational theory that for them proves (together with much faith in fake science) there is no God.

In the Pennsylvania Middle District Court, Judge Jones ruled against the defendant, Dover school board, that wanted to add the following statement to their biology curriculum, “Students will be made aware of the gaps/problems in Darwin’s theory and of other theories of evolution including, but not limited to, intelligent design. Note: Origins of life is not taught.” The judge concluded there was evidence to support a verdict that Intelligent Design was equivalent to Creationism, although it was clear that the school board did not believe all existing science comported with evolutionary doctrine. His conclusion that it was equivalent to Creationism linked his decision to the Supreme Court case, Edwards v. Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578 (1987), which declared the teaching of Creationism contrary to the Constitutions Establishment clause.

One important principle that is lost on most people today is that a Federal District Court has jurisdiction in its own district only. The eleven Circuit Courts of Appeal have authority only over their individual regions. There are differences in various districts and occasionally between Circuits. Therefore, the precident of the Kitzmiller case is only controlling in the Middle District of Pennsylvania. Other states and school boards across the nation are free to include in their curriculum encouragement to explore, test, critique and/or otherwise pursue scientific fact and theory that contradicts evolution. In his ruling he failed to adequately address the school boards intent to foster open scientific inquiry and investigation among its students and faculty, but defended a flawed evolution theory and attributed only religious zealotry to the school board.

The forces of secular humanism have established evolution as a secure base for their assualt on truth, free speech, and critique of their fascist ideology. Therefore, any educational authority that chooses to restore a healthy and uncompromising search for truth regarding the origin of life and the cosmos should expect a well organized opposition of evolutionists dogma, propaganda, and media smear tactics. Science is on the side of open analysis, unbiased testing, and search for the truth, not measured by supposed votes of how many so-called experts or scientists believe in evolution, but by the actual cosmos around us, its physical laws, characteristics and nature, seen and unseen. Every student in American public schools must be taught evolution, that everything which exists sprang from nothing through eons of random chance and happenstance such that all the complexity, wisdom, ingenuity, beauty, function and design, and interrelated purpose of all things, even every child is only a freak accident of nature. It’s a lie and most people know it. This is what the Bible says about it. “The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of people, who suppress the truth by their wickedness, since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.” (Romans 1: 18-20).

A Theory For Atheists

If you are a devoted atheist you will need some “Science” to support anything you believe, or at least a theory that has not been fully discredited. This is the status of science today, as so much of what is called fact can not be established through the scientific method here and now. Therefore, theories carry significant weight in scientific research. Unknowns are explained with theories that are further supported or discredited by observation, new discoveries, conjecture and/or educated guesses. For example, until recently, the universe and related theories about it were based on an assumption that the universe always existed in a static state. New scientific discoveries reveal that the universe is expanding which obliterated the static model and all theory based upon it. An expanding universe presents all sorts of new questions because it points to a beginning a millisecond before the so called “Big Bang.”

Cosmology, the study of the origin of the universe, currently concludes that over billions of years random and forced events caused elements to combine into molecules that were converted to amino acids that eventually came to life and burst into a plethora of prehistoric life. The fossil record, depicted in the cambium layer, shows a single unique period on earth where life exploded into a multitude of organisms, but it does not reveal any links between separate species. Different species do mutate, adapt and adjust to their environment, or fail to and become extinct. No new species have evolved during recorded history or in the fossil record, since they first appeared. Nevertheless, evolution is now declared scientific fact, based on a presumed majority of scientists’ acceptance. While fact and truth can not be voted into reality, let’s assume a natural and random process of evolution caused life and formed all species we now see. This same process of random chance must still be in force, unless by its accidental creation of man evolution produced an animal greater than itself and was promptly terminated by man through his own intervention.

If human development did not stop evolution then we can predict that a perfect human will evolve sometime in human history. That perfect person, by chance will have abilities that evolution will endow, which exceed those yet observed or scientifically established in humanity to date. This perfect mutation will not be prone to war, hatred, selfishness, greed and all the other deficiencies of mankind. Moreover, he will demonstrate abilities traditional man does not have. Like the movie “Water World” he will grow gills in order to live if the earth becomes covered by water. Like the movie “The Matrix” he will be a Messiah with abilities that transcend those of ordinary men and women.

There are things which science can not explain. Today, people are miraculously healed and medical science can not refute the effect nor explain the cause. History points to a messiah, a perfect man, who was killed by the Roman empire, yet returned to life three days later. He exhibited supernatural powers and was above the failings, vices, and wickedness observed in ordinary men. A man of science may very well consider the vast evidence supporting the words, actions, and deeds of the perfect man, Yeshua of Nazareth, and recognize that He was supernatural. Even His birth was extraordinary. Was this Messiah a product of the evolution of Mankind? Considering He was the product of evolution, should we not listen to His enlightened understanding and give heed to His admonition? What did He say, oh yeah, there is a Creator God in heaven who made all things.

A Matter of Faith

This 2014 movie is about evolution versus creationism, a topic which few in the secular mainstream would find interesting, but Christians might.  As a “Christian” film it does not have the flash, pomp, and professionalism that fifty million dollars can buy.  Harry Anderson plays a biology professor at a state University who religiously promotes evolution in his classes.  A Christian freshman is confronted with evolution taught as incontrovertible fact while her parents fear that her faith is being destroyed.  Thus, a debate between these two opposing theories for the origin of life ensues.

It is rated 3.7 on IMDB which shocked me as I have seen many 6.5 movies that were much worse than this movie.  Harry Anderson’s acting was outstanding.  The plot did include some worn out stereotypical scenes about college as a faith destroying experience, yet, it had some pleasant surprises as well.  Some reviews criticized the writer for thinking anyone who believes in evolution might be persuaded by this film.  I don’t think that was the intent, rather it was to present evolution as requiring faith just as creationism does.  Christian reviews gave this movie high marks because it was a movie aimed for that audience.

In secular society and the anti-christian media evolution won the debate decades ago.  It is taught even in grade school as fact, scientifically proven, and distinct from any other suggestion about the origin of life.  The Humanists who achieved this undisputed championship of heavyweight ideas, did so with tremendous fervor, subtlety and passion, but it didn’t hurt that the US Federal government was in their corner.  Of course, they are not going to be convinced by anything that their faith in “science” is flawed.  Almost all scientific discovery is put through tremendous critique by other scientists in order to satisfy its truth.  This process has weeded out many false discoveries and exposed errors.  Evolution has been criticized by Christians, but its promotors have rallied groups of scientists to defend it rather than perform the normal verification processes.  I have friends who are recognized and respected scientists who speak of the bias and blind acceptance that has been attributed by the scientific community to evolution.  It is the sacred cow of the academic scientific community and they defend their faith vehemently.

The important debate is between Christians who hold to a literal interpretation of Genesis with a young earth position and those who interpret Genesis less literally, yet true, equally admitting God as Creator, but granting a much older earth. Were Believers able to unite under a banner of Creator God, Evolution theory might be exposed by true science as the fraud it actually is, being contrary to the physical laws of nature, having fraudulent links between species, the hoax of primordial soups sufficiency, lacking mathematically sound time frames of permutation, unexplained rationale of observed design complexity, and a myriad of other deficiencies that render Evolution as a very unsound, largely disproved theory.  Is it more important to rid the secular educational system of the lie of evolution or continue to demand that faith in our Creator be taught as well?  Some consider it demeaning to consider Christian faith a mere alternative with secular humanistic evolution.  Finally, recent verification of the Big Bang theory has pointed to the necessity of an initiator/Creator, which standing alone undermines evolution as an origin of life.

This brings us to the other glaring issue that is misrepresented in this movie – the normal secular College experience will destroy a Christians tender faith.  The quote, “Bad company corrupts good morals” is true, but Believers have far more to offer the inquisitive collegiate than the world.  Moreover, God watches over those who belong to Him and He that is within us is greater than he who is in the world.  Believers are the salt of the earth and release saving power as they go. Scriptures do not recommend close relationships with unbelievers (2 Cor. 6: 14), but that does not mean we are to hide in fear or avoid acquaintance with our fellow man.  God is well able to strengthen faith during the college experience.  In fact through recent years college campus organizations like Campus Crusade of Christ, YWAM, and many others have strengthened collegiate young tremendously.  In real life God is Sovereign and triumphant over the world’s corruption and deceit.  Believers have every reason to be bold and trust in God’s lovingkindness and saving assurance.

Correcting the Record

Imagine if your child came home from school and told you that the best thing to do when you get cut is to put cow dunk on it and bleed a lot if you have a fever.  This is where we are in public education today.  All but the very oldest people alive today were taught in public educational institutions that the theory of evolution had been established as fact, based on scientist’s ability to fashion a primordial soup of amino acids from primary elements.  From these amino acids they affirmed that life evolved through infinite permutations by random chance.  Since the 1980’s evidence has been mounting that the universe was created/initiated in a big bang that developed all the existing stars, galaxies, nebulae, quasars, comets, planets, astroids, moons, and black holes in their current expanding order.  Halley’s discovery of red shift validated and supported Einstein’s theory of relativity and the general laws of thermodynamics and astrophysic observations to date.  Most importantly critical is that factual evidence supporting the Big Bang points to a beginning of the universe.  Most estimates of this beginning reach a time frame of approximately fifteen billion years.

The critical premise of evolution is that the universe is static and infinite.  In other words, the universe as we see it today has always existed.  This is necessary to allow enough time for random chance to form everything in perfect sequence and order to spawn single cell life and have it evolve into everything we see today.  This time frame must be infinite, because it is far greater than the chance of rolling a million dice at one once and having each die land on one as each dice must land on one in several consecutive rolls.  Yes, in an infinite universe this could happen, but not in a universe that is only fifteen billion years old.  Therefore, evolution is disproven as an explanation for the source of life.  It may be that various species have mutated into variations of their original nature, but we have never observed the creation of a new species in human history.  Mathematics has proven that the theory of evolution is false because our universe had a beginning which is far too recent to allow for evolution theory.

Today, all teaching and references to evolution theory should be eliminated from all public educational institutions, from all nature videos, from all scientific communications that are not devoted to scientific history and the vast number of flawed and disproven theories proposed in the old days.  Many science texts must be discarded lest we teach a form of humanistic religion that clings to a false idea.  Even before the evidence and observations we have today evolution theory had a serious weakness in its supporting factual basis, i.e. none existed.  It requires too much faith to believe a wrist watch could randomly be created by happenstance while the human and biological existence around us is far more complex than a wrist watch.  Such faith proceeded from Secular Humanism that requires an explanation, irrespective of whether it contradicts the laws of general relativity or thermodynamics, that nothing was created and there is no creator/initiator. It is now time to correct the record, disavow and debunk evolution theory.  Those who hang on to these false notions can join others  who think the earth is flat, it is the center of the universe, the sun orbits the earth, and it rests upon the shoulders of four great elephants. 

The Fingerprint of God

If this being is omnipotent, then every occurrence, including every human action, every human thought, every human feeling and aspiration is also His work; how is it possible to think of holding men responsible for their deeds and thoughts before such an almighty Being?  In giving out punishment and rewards he would to a certain extent be passing judgment on Himself.  How can this be combined with the goodness and righteousness ascribed to Him. –Albert Einstein.

Scientists (and atheists and agnostics) who refuse to accept the abundant evidence which establishes there is a Creator, do so because they falsely judge God Himself, rather than refute the evidence.  They continue to devise more and more bizarre loopholes to escape these findings, but these are always refuted by observations, facts and measurement.  Hugh Ross’ book titled as above, lays out a history of cosmology, the study of the origin and development of the universe, beginning with the Chinese and Mesopotamian’s some six thousand years ago through today.  He also compares theological based conclusions with those of Scientists.  Both have been very wrong regarding their cosmology, but stubborn to concede the truth.  He points out that the scientists have proved the more stubborn of the two.

For the longest time it was thought the universe was eternal and fixed.  This spawned evolution theory based on spontaneous generation through random chance.  As evidence of Scientist’s stubbornness evolution still floats around even though it is statistically impossible.  However, the evidence for a big bang event and a still expanding universe refutes a static eternal theory and establishes a fixed beginning of the universe.  Based on all estimates, there is not adequate time from this beginning to allow mathematically, random chance events to all perfectly happen in required sequence to generate all things we now see.  This beginning corroborates the existence of an outside creator/initiator.  Many other theories and undefined factors have been proposed to negate the inevitable conclusion of God, but they do not hold true. Einstein invented his “cosmological constant” to preserve a static universe.  In 1931, following Hubble’s publication on the law of red shifts, he discarded his constant conceding that its introduction was “the greatest mistake of his life.”

This book is a remarkable primer for anyone who questions the veracity of scientific cosmology.  It also addresses the apparent conflicts between the Genesis accounts in the Bible and scientific evidence, and the seeming paradox that obstructs so many, like Einstein, who could not find God just on his terms.  The Bible states, “The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of people, who suppress the truth by their wickedness, since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them.  For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualitieshis eternal power and divine naturehave been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.” (Romans 1: 18-20).  Even without today’s scientific discoveries about the universe, God has revealed His existence.  How gracious God is to give us through science such insight and further proof of His Creative work.

Observations on Evolution

CKsZrMSUsAIaa3x.jpg“By faith we understand that the universe was created by the word of God, so that what is seen was not made out of things that are visible.”  Hebrews 11:3.

In the essay “Is Theology Poetry” C. S. Lewis discusses his view of the universal evolution theory  – “By universal evolutionism I mean the belief that the very formula of universal process is from imperfect to perfect, from small beginnings to great endings, from the rudimentary to the elaborate, the belief which makes people find it natural to think that morality springs from savage taboos, adult sentiment from infantile Continue reading

Observations on Evolution

weighingcreation“By faith we understand that the universe was created by the word of God, so that what is seen was not made out of things that are visible.”  Hebrews 11:3.

In the essay “Is Theology Poetry” C. S. Lewis discusses his view of the universal evolution theory  – “By universal evolutionism I mean the belief that the very formula of universal process is from imperfect to perfect, from small beginnings to great endings, from the rudimentary to the elaborate, the belief which makes people Continue reading

True Confession

scan0021The Bible teaches and proves that nothing is impossible with God. (Mark 10:27). Evolutionists believe anything is possible with enough time and chance.  Flying enough flags for long enough will cause the threads of a flag to unravel and re-weave itself into a three-piece suit.  Given enough time a sunken ship will dissolve and rust down to produce  twenty-four lawn jockeys, three flying saucers, five golden rings, and a partridge in a pear tree.

I dreamed that my grand-daughter came up to my wife; she was about four years old and had curly dark auburn hair long and thick.  Since this does not describe any of my existing grand children we thought, maybe, this is a baby yet to be born.  How precious this child Continue reading

This is Not Rocket Science

22I saw a very serious report on a major network national news segment discussing the plans necessary to inhabit Mars as an alternative to Earth.  Mars is a dry rock, without a breathable atmosphere, and incapable of sustaining any existing life.  Simple common sense shows there is no possibility of making it habitable.  The soil and environment will not grow any existing life.  Even in a worse case scenario , it would be much easier to clean up earth, all its water, all its air, all its soil, rather than attempt… Continue reading