The majority of the food we eat has seeds in it. These seeds when planted or merely dropped on fertile soil would grow into another plant and eventually produce more food. This relationship between beings and plants on this planet is so remarkable as to indicate intelligent design. This premise with far more and better illustrations was linked to creationism in a US District court, Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, 400 F. Supp. 2d 707 (M.D. Pa. 2005). Can any Court define what is science and what is not? The assumption of the case was that “detailed scientific examination has rebutted the claims that evolutionary explanations are inadequate.” This is a double negative which covertly asserts that science has proved evolution as a fact that is beyond question. Much of the comments about this case relate to the parties, the witnesses, the judge, and everyones beliefs, motives, and intents whether spoken or not. It is a horrible case for that reason, and others, and it should have been about the actual statute that sought to bolster scientific inquiry into alternatives to evolution and open further study into gaps, weaknesses, and uncertainty of evolution as a theory about the origin of life. Most recently science has shown that the universe exploded into existence in what is called the “Big Bang”. This discovery puts evolution theory in great peril as it limits the infinite time upon which evolution theory hindges. 

The greatest hoaxs in evolution’s scientific proof is the so-called “primordial soup”. Carbon-13 to carbon-12 ratio analysis, plus nitrogen-15 to nitrogen-14 ratio analysis on ancient carbonaceous material, further establishes that a primordial soup or mineral substrate of prebiotic molecules, never existed on earth. See Mink T. Rosing, “C-Depleted Carbon Microparticles”, p.674-76; Stephen J. Mojzsis et AL “Evidence for life on earth before 3,800 Million Years Ago”, etc. There are too many other errors and inconsistencies with evolution to enumerate, but the humanist lobby prevents any critique of their foundational theory that for them proves (together with much faith in fake science) there is no God.

In the Pennsylvania Middle District Court, Judge Jones ruled against the defendant, Dover school board, that wanted to add the following statement to their biology curriculum, “Students will be made aware of the gaps/problems in Darwin’s theory and of other theories of evolution including, but not limited to, intelligent design. Note: Origins of life is not taught.” The judge concluded there was evidence to support a verdict that Intelligent Design was equivalent to Creationism, although it was clear that the school board did not believe all existing science comported with evolutionary doctrine. His conclusion that it was equivalent to Creationism linked his decision to the Supreme Court case, Edwards v. Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578 (1987), which declared the teaching of Creationism contrary to the Constitutions Establishment clause.

One important principle that is lost on most people today is that a Federal District Court has jurisdiction in its own district only. The eleven Circuit Courts of Appeal have authority only over their individual regions. There are differences in various districts and occasionally between Circuits. Therefore, the precident of the Kitzmiller case is only controlling in the Middle District of Pennsylvania. Other states and school boards across the nation are free to include in their curriculum encouragement to explore, test, critique and/or otherwise pursue scientific fact and theory that contradicts evolution. In his ruling he failed to adequately address the school boards intent to foster open scientific inquiry and investigation among its students and faculty, but defended a flawed evolution theory and attributed only religious zealotry to the school board.

The forces of secular humanism have established evolution as a secure base for their assualt on truth, free speech, and critique of their fascist ideology. Therefore, any educational authority that chooses to restore a healthy and uncompromising search for truth regarding the origin of life and the cosmos should expect a well organized opposition of evolutionists dogma, propaganda, and media smear tactics. Science is on the side of open analysis, unbiased testing, and search for the truth, not measured by supposed votes of how many so-called experts or scientists believe in evolution, but by the actual cosmos around us, its physical laws, characteristics and nature, seen and unseen. Every student in American public schools must be taught evolution, that everything which exists sprang from nothing through eons of random chance and happenstance such that all the complexity, wisdom, ingenuity, beauty, function and design, and interrelated purpose of all things, even every child is only a freak accident of nature. It’s a lie and most people know it. This is what the Bible says about it. “The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of people, who suppress the truth by their wickedness, since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them. For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.” (Romans 1: 18-20).